It seems that the Trump administration has continued to press to get rid of DACA and that the Supreme Court has now decided to hear the case:
The Supreme Court will decide whether the Trump administration may shut down a program that shields some 800,000 young, undocumented immigrants from deportation, the court said on Friday.
The court will hear arguments in the case during its next term, which starts in October, and will probably issue its decision in the spring or summer of 2020, ensuring a fierce immigration debate over the outcome in the midst of the presidential campaign.
Since DACA was an executive order, the President has the right to change it but there are still rules that need to be followed and, like most things it does, the Trump administration didn’t do it properly according to courts:
In November, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in San Francisco, ruled against the administration. It acknowledged that presidents have broad powers to alter the policies of earlier administrations but said the legal rationale offered by the Trump administration did not withstand scrutiny. The court also questioned “the cruelty and wastefulness of deporting productive young people to countries with which they have no ties.”
In May, a second federal appeals court, the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, Va., issued a similar ruling.
Here is part of the ruling in the Virginia court:
The point is that the Department had before it at the time it rescinded DACA a reasoned analysis from the office tasked with providing legal advice to all executive branch agencies that supported the policy’s legality. Yet the Department changed course without any explanation for why that analysis was faulty. Cf. Fox Television Stations, 556 U.S. at 516 (“[A] reasoned explanation is needed for disregarding facts and circumstances that underlay . . . the prior policy.”).
Nor did the Department adequately account for the reliance interests that would be affected by its decision. Hundreds of thousands of people had structured their lives on the availability of deferred action during the over five years between the implementation of DACA and the decision to rescind. Although the government insists that Acting considered these interests in connection with her decision to rescind DACA, her Memo makes no mention of them.
We can assume more incompetence from the Trump administration but at some point they will actually get things right, so we need to get him out of office.