I wrote about this awhile back and thought I would put in the final numbers for the record number of filibusters in the 110th congress (from here). Here it is in graphic form (it starts with the 66th congress, 1919-1920, since the cloture rule was added in 1917 and its first use was in 1919)
Note: graph edited 2/20/13 to include data through the end of the 112th Congress (click on the graph to see a larger version)
This is not exact for a few reasons:
this is looking at cloture votes not filibusters–not every filibuster will have a cloture vote;
cloture is used to end debate and can be used for things other than a filibuster;
the rules have changed over time: the number of votes needed for cloture originally was 67, but was changed to 60 (with some exceptions) in 1975; the rules for the filibuster have been relaxed (if one side insists on the full Mr Smith goes to Washington version then no other business can happen).
This means that comparisons over time are difficult, the change from the number of cloture votes from the 1950s to now is at least partially due to the increased willingness for a cloture call (it used to be that a cloture vote wasn’t called for a while after the start of the filibuster, now it’s more likely that it will be called quickly). Still this about the best we can do–it’s pretty much impossible to count filibusters themselves–and should be ok when comparing the 110th Congress to others in the last 30 years or so. If you do that, you’ll see that the increased use of cloture began in 1971-2 and that the 110th Congress easily set a record for the number of cloture filings.
2/12/2010 update: To get an idea of the problems involved in figuring out how many filibusters there are, look at the cloture motions for Presidential nominations since 1987 (the search only goes back that far–a paper here says cloture was sought in 35 nominations from 1949-2002, with cloture votes not allowed on nominees before 1949, and all but 3 of these were eventually confirmed; putting these together we get 124 cloture votes on nominees–this is not exact since there is at least one name that is not in both lists):
there have been 76 nominations since 1987 where there was a motion for cloture;
in all but 18 cases the nominee was confirmed in that session;
of those, 6 were later confirmed (this is 7 in a way since one person was nominated to two positions); 4 were given recess appointments; 6 did not get the position; Craig Becker lost a cloture vote on 2/9/10.
Put together there would be a total of 124 nominees who had a cloture vote with 14 not eventually confirmed (of which 4 got recess appointments and Becker is not done yet).
This sounds trivial given the number of nominations (there have been 1487 during this session of Congress alone), but misses something. First most of the nominations are for the military (for promotions for example). Second many of the blocks are not done by filibusters but instead by blue slips or holds which are almost impossible to count since they’re fairly informal, but certainly greatly outnumber the number of filibusters.
I’ll put the numbers below the fold if you’re interested.
Years # Filed # Votes # Invoked
2017-2018 90 85 82 (through 2/1/2018)
2015-2016 128 123 60
2013-2014 253 218 187
2011-2012 115 73 41
2009-2010 137 91 63
2007-2008 139 112 61 (110th session)
2005-2006 68 54 34
2003-2004 62 49 12
2001-2002 71 61 34
1999-2000 71 58 28
1997-1998 69 53 18
1995-1996 82 50 9
1993-1994 80 46 14
1991-1992 60 48 23
1989-1990 38 24 11
1987-1988 54 43 12 (100th session)
1985-1986 41 23 10
1983-1984 41 19 11
1981-1982 31 30 10
1979-1980 30 20 11
1977-1978 23 13 3
1975-1976 39 27 17 (# needed for cloture decreases to 60)
1973-1974 44 31 9
1971-1972 23 20 4
1969-1970 7 6 0
1967-1968 6 6 1
1965-1966 7 7 1
1963-1964 4 3 1
1961-1962 4 4 1
1959-1960 1 1 0
1957-1958 0 0 0
1955-1956 0 0 0
1953-1954 1 1 0
1951-1952 0 0 0
1949-1950 2 2 0
1947-1948 0 0 0
1945-1946 6 4 0
1943-1944 1 1 0
1941-1942 1 1 0
1939-1940 0 0 0
1937-1938 2 2 0
1935-1936 0 0 0
1933-1934 0 0 0
1931-1932 2 1 0
1929-1930 1 0 0
1927-1928 1 0 0
1925-1926 7 7 3
1923-1924 0 0 0
1921-1922 1 1 0
1919-1920 2 2 1 (the 66th session)
Duncan O'Neil
Oct 08, 2010 @ 11:43:41
Using this cloture data reveals that the parties are nearly equal on the use of filibusters. Presuming all of them are a result of the same.
Then there is the thought that the minority party thought the issue in question was really not a good idea!
fredtopeka
Oct 14, 2010 @ 13:18:14
I assume this is a spam comment, but I can’t leave it. If you look at the last two sessions, there has been a large jump in the number of cloture votes, so no there is not a ‘nearly equal’ use.
Brian
Oct 18, 2010 @ 16:01:58
Since the obvious increase in the number of filibusters is soon to follow mid-term election victories for the Republicans, are we going to see a new era of obstructionism by the minority party? I mean, aren’t the Republicans about to be rewarded for playing politics instead of doing their jobs and doesn’t that set the tone for the next group looking to regain their lost majority? It is a scary precedent and I believe it will continue to grind legislation to a halt in the future.
fredtopeka
Oct 18, 2010 @ 20:00:36
It is possible, but there are two reasons I don’t think it will happen:
1. Democrats are expected to hold the Senate, so they can just vote down things they don’t like. And, since bills are supposed to originate in the House, not many bills sponsored by Democrats will make it to the Senate (assuming Republicans take control of the House).
2. Obama will still be President which means he can Veto many of the bills.
This doesn’t mean that there isn’t a long term problem, there is. Something has to change–either the way the parties interact or the rules of the Senate.
Anonymous
Jul 31, 2011 @ 21:34:07
It is obvious that the current Republicans are intent on being dictators.
If they don’t get their way, they will prevent government from working.