No Olympics in China

This week is the week for Olympics news. We learned yesterday that Boston will not be hosting the 2024 Olympics and the Olympics committee will decide where the 2022 Winter Olympics will be held on Friday.

The articles on the choice for 2022 typically are like this one:

Chinese organizers have repeatedly stressed they would put on ‘‘sustainable’’ and ‘‘economical’’ games, using infrastructure from the 2008 Summer Games and promising to leave a ‘‘powerful legacy’’ by developing a winter sports market for China and east Asia.

Critics point to China’s lack of Alpine venues, and the distance from Beijing of suitable mountainous regions as having a negative impact on the bid.

Beijing insists it has sufficient water supplies for snow-making and can provide excellent conditions for ski competitions.

Both countries have been assailed for their human rights records. Human Rights Watch issued a report criticizing Kazakhstan’s ‘‘hostility and abuse’’ toward lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people. China has been involved in a recent crackdown on rights lawyers.

This is one of the few articles that notes something I mentioned after the 2008 Summer Olympics in China:

Golog Jigme said in an interview that he was troubled that the International Olympic Committee would award the Winter Games to Beijing after the Chinese government broke promises it made during its earlier bid for the Olympics.

At the time, China assured the committee that it would improve press freedom, honor its international human rights commitments and even allow protests during the games. Although foreign journalists were given unfiltered Internet access at the official media center in Beijing, the government vigorously censored negative news about the games and security officials made sure that the designated protest zones set up around the city were empty. (Many who applied to protest in those areas were detained while filing their applications.)

Here’s an article that is somewhere in between:

As with its 2008 bid, Beijing has come under intense criticism from human rights groups who say giving it the games will only reward the communist government for its strict limits on political organization and freedom of speech.

They’ve been given further ammunition by an ongoing campaign against human rights lawyers, dozens of whom have been detained in recent weeks. That’s seen as part of a drive by president and Communist Party head Xi Jinping _ China’s most powerful leader in decades _ to further shrink the space for political critics.

The Internet also remains heavily regulated, with some social media sites blocked entirely. Organizers have pledged to lift those restrictions for the games.

Minority groups, especially Tibetans, Mongolians and Uighurs from the far northwestern region of Xinjiang, have also complained of tighter limits on political and religious life as well as being denied the right to travel abroad.

Despite commitments to loosen rules on foreign reporters in the country made during the 2008 games, Tibetan and Uighur areas remain largely off-limits to the media.

So, the article says that China is making promises to get the Olympics and notes that currently China is not following rules it promised to follow for the 2008 Olympics, but doesn’t directly say that China broke their promises in 2008. That would seem to be important–after all, why should anyone trust their promises this time around?

It’s sunny in Malden

This is a great picture of the Sun, showing how dynamic it is (Credit: NASA/SDO):


It seems that astronaut Scott Kelly took a picture of the Boston area this morning:


At first this confused me because the river in the middle of the picture is a mix of the Boston Harbor and then the Mystic and Chelsea rivers (the Charles is the one that appears to be going south–this also explains why it confused me at first, the Charles is mostly going east to west). The little spur off the Mystic near the left part of the picture is the Malden River, I live not too far from the end of it (the river goes underground. What looks like three white dots is Malden High School, I live a few blocks east of there (almost directly above it in the picture)). At 9:39 am I was inside or you could have seen me.

Once you get your bearings you can see downtown, the Commons and Public Gardens, Logan Airport (this is obvious), South Boston is at the bottom right (the enclosed body of water is at the end, you can see Fort Independence Park), East Boston is just to the west of the airport (yeah, South Boston southeast of East Boston), the peninsula at the top is Deer Island (you can see part of the waste treatment facility that has made Boston Harbor so much cleaner; it was an island until the hurricane of 1938) which goes into Winthrop if you follow it back.

Pay to play

Let’s see what’s happening in Faneuil Hall:

Starting next month, street performers at Faneuil Hall will have to do more than perform — they will also have to pay for the privilege of entertaining the crowd.
In a move that has outraged the popular musicians, acrobats, and other entertainers, Faneuil Hall Marketplace management wants performers to pay fees that run as high as $2,500 annually, saying the charges are needed to offset administration, promotion, and security costs.

Performers learned about the new fees last month, just a week before summer auditions were scheduled to begin. Angry over the late notice, they boycotted the auditions, causing them to be canceled.

Most places pay performers, but when you’re a billion dollar company like Ashkenazy you expect everyone to pay you. And it’s not like the entertainers are a major part of the attraction, oh wait.

Charlie Baker and the T

Governor Baker wants to reform the MBTA. Let’s see some of those plans:

In an attempt to overhaul the embattled Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, Governor Charlie Baker on Wednesday proposed the creation of a board he would appoint to take control of the finances and operations of the agency.

The new fiscal and management control board would oversee the T for three to five years, taking power away from the Massachusetts Department of Transportation board, under the legislation filed by the administration Wednesday.

Add more administration, check.

The bill would also open the door to fare increases by eliminating the cap on how high and how often the T can raise its fares. No immediate fare increases are contemplated, however.

Increase the price, but not yet–don’t want people to get too mad. Wait a bit and let somebody else be the face of the increase, courage!

In his legislation, Baker also proposed the elimination of promised additional funding that was outlined for state transportation system, including the T, in a 2013 transportation finance bill. Over the next five fiscal years, the transportation system would have received an additional $500 million under the law.

Cut funding to the T, check.

Baker also proposed substantial changes to the Transportation Department board, which would still oversee department business. The administration hopes to expand the department board from seven to 11 members, with eight serving four-year terms at the same time as the governor.

Hey, even more new administration.

The proposal is sure to stoke opposition from the agency’s unions. Baker took aim at the MBTA’s pensions, proposing an independent audit of the retirement fund within 180 days of the law going into effect. The legislation would stop retirement payments to the fund for new hires until the audit is completed.

The bill also asks the Legislature to change the agency’s binding arbitration system for labor contracts, which critics have seen as a drain to the T’s finances. Under the legislation, the fiscal control board would need to approve an arbitrator’s award in a labor dispute.

Cut pay and benefits, check.

In addition, Baker wants to free the agency of the Pacheco law, an antiprivatization law that makes it difficult for the T to contract out major services.

Prepare to privatize as much as possible, check.

Yup, this is a Republican governor all right.

Governor Baker says Massachusetts is at best average

It seems Governor Baker wants to ‘streamline‘ Massachusetts. Here’s the full executive order:

WHEREAS, government regulations are intended to protect public health, safety, environmental and welfare functions and to improve the operation of government for the citizens of the Commonwealth;

WHEREAS, many of the regulations adopted by state government agencies and offices have imposed unnecessary cost, burden and complexity;

WHEREAS, confusing, unnecessary, inconsistent and redundant government regulations inconvenience individuals, encumber cities and towns, stress resources of non-profit organizations, including our health care and educational institutions, inhibit business growth and the creation of jobs, and place Massachusetts for profit enterprises at a competitive disadvantage relative to their out-of-state and foreign competitors;

WHEREAS, state agencies and offices across the Commonwealth must coordinate and collaborate with one another to ensure that the government speaks in one voice, creating an efficient, coherent and consistent regulatory framework.

WHEREAS, the citizens and customers of the Commonwealth will be better served by reducing the number, length, and complexity of regulations, leaving only those that are essential to the public good; and

WHEREAS, a finite statewide regulatory review process is needed immediately to relieve the Commonwealth from the burden of unnecessary regulation.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, CHARLES D. BAKER, Governor of the Commonwealth of

Massachusetts, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution, Part 2, c. 2, § 1, Art. 1, do hereby revoke Executive Order No. 485 and order as follows:

Section 1.  I direct each secretariat, agency, department, board, commission, authority or other body within the Executive Department (hereinafter “Agency”), and invite and encourage any such governmental body not under my supervision, to promptly undertake a review of each and every regulation currently published in the Code of Massachusetts Regulations under its jurisdiction.

Section 2.  Except as provided below, each Agency shall sunset all its regulations on or before March 31, 2016 by taking such steps as required by law, including pursuant to G.L. c. 30A, to rescind, revise or simplify such regulations, after conducting the review prescribed in this Order.

Section 3.  In conducting such review, which shall be coordinated across all Agencies and participating governmental bodies, only those regulations which are mandated by law or essential to the health, safety, environment or welfare of the Commonwealth’s residents shall be retained or modified. In order to find that a regulation meets this standard, the Agency must demonstrate, in its review, that:

It’s a good thing the Massachusetts minimum wage is law.

a. there is a clearly identified need for governmental intervention that is best addressed by the Agency and not another Agency or governmental body;

b. the costs of the regulation do not exceed the benefits that would result from the regulation;

Ooh, a cost-benefit analysis. That’s always a code for getting rid of environmental rules, safety regulations, and the like.

c. the regulation does not exceed federal requirements or duplicate local requirements;

Because we don’t want to be better than Mississippi.

d. less restrictive and intrusive alternatives have been considered and found less desirable based on a sound evaluation of the alternatives;

e. the regulation does not unduly and adversely affect Massachusetts citizens and customers of the Commonwealth, or the competitive environment in Massachusetts;

Gee, I wonder what happens if it helps people but hurts the competitive environment?

f. the Agency has established a process and a schedule for measuring the effectiveness of the regulation; and

g. the regulation is time-limited or provides for regular review.

In addition, regulations not meeting the standard set forth in G.L. c. 30A, §5 shall be rescinded in accordance with law.

Section 4.  In its review, each Agency shall ensure that every regulation is clear, concise and written in plain and readily understandable language.

Section 5.  Beginning immediately, no Agency shall promulgate a new regulation which has not been reviewed pursuant to this Order and does not meet the standards set out in this Order.

Section 6.  Each Agency shall prepare in connection with any proposed, new regulation a business/competitiveness impact statement that will include a competitiveness review and assess disruptive economic impacts on small businesses, as required by G.L. c. 30A, § 5, and all other potentially impacted entities, including cities and towns, non-profit organizations and medium and large for profit enterprises, as prescribed and for such period of time as desired by the Secretary of Administration and Finance, notwithstanding the effective date of this Order. Such business/competitiveness impact statements will be made available on the Commonwealth’s website.

First a cost-benefit analysis bit and now a competitiveness review.

Section 7.  Before proposing to adopt a new regulation, each Agency shall submit the regulation, together with the business/competitiveness impact statement required by Section 6 above, to the Cabinet secretary overseeing that Agency. If approved, the Cabinet secretary overseeing that Agency, or her designee, shall submit the regulation, together with the required business/competitiveness impact statement, for review and approval by the Secretary of Administration and Finance, in the manner prescribed by her.

Just in case you didn’t notice the required business/competitiveness impact statement above, it’s repeated twice more.

Section 8.  The Secretary of Administration and Finance shall, consistent with the requirements of law, establish such processes for encouraging public input, standards and schedules as she deems appropriate to accomplish the review of regulations required by this Order. The Secretary may also provide for such waivers or exceptions to this Executive Order as are essential for the public health, safety, environment or welfare.

Section 9.  The pause on the filing of new regulations established by letter dated January 15, 2015 and executed by the Secretary of Administration and Finance shall remain in effect until further notice.

Section 10. This Executive Order shall remain in effect until March 31, 2016.


Given at the Executive Chamber in Boston this 31st day of March in the year of our Lord two thousand and fifteen and of the Independence of the United States of America two hundred thirty-nine.





Commonwealth of Massachusetts




Secretary of the Commonwealth


Because Charlie Baker won’t–oops, sorry was that too mean? Nah, given how much more often business is mentioned than the citizenry.

Anyway, let’s see what those Baker aides are saying:

Administration officials argue that the order is not as rigid as critics claim. The order says an existing regulation could stay in place if “less restrictive and intrusive alternatives have been considered and found less desirable based on a sound evaluation of the alternatives.” Baker’s secretary of administration and finance also has the right to grant waivers.

So a regulation could stay in place–makes me real confident. AIM says we shouldn’t worry too much:

And Rick Lord, president and chief executive of Associated Industries of Massachusetts, dismissed the charge that well-financed interests will use the review to ease state regulations.

“There will be public hearings, all parties will be able to weigh in. That is the way public policy works,” Lord said. He said AIM’s members, who do business across the country and rate bureaucratic red tape a top irritant, face a burdensome dual system of regulations because of the difference between Massachusetts and federal standards.

I wonder why he’s so confident?

Kristen Lepore was sworn in as Secretary of the Executive Office for Administration and Finance under Governor Charlie Baker in January 2015.  In her role, Secretary Lepore is in charge of formulating the governor’s budget plan, providing guidance on the economy, and implementing state government’s operating and capital budgets.  She also manages the state’s administrative agencies, including revenue collection, information technology, human resources, procurement, and state facilities.

She was previously Vice President of Government Affairs at Associated Industries of Massachusetts (AIM).  As Vice President, she was responsible for AIM’s health care agenda and advocated for policies to lower the cost of health care in Massachusetts.  She also worked on education and workforce development issues on behalf of the association.

Ah. It doesn’t exactly fill me with confidence though.

“The governor believes reviewing regulations, as prior administrations have, is essential to making state government more accountable to the people, and the executive order makes clear that only onerous, unnecessary regulations will be reviewed,” Baker’s spokesman Tim Buckley said in an e-mailed statement.

Actually, the order says: ‘to promptly undertake a review of each and every regulation currently published in the Code of Massachusetts Regulations under its jurisdiction.’ Maybe Buckley didn’t read the order?

For comparison, here is Executive Order 485 and Executive Order 384 (the one cancelled by 485 and the clear model for this one).

MBTA panel: first cut ridership

Let’s see what the panel appointed by our Republican governor says should be done about the problems at the MBTA:

An expert panel convened by Governor Charlie Baker to diagnose problems at the MBTA faults the agency for “limited cost control, low labor productivity, and high maintenance costs,” according to a draft of the group’s report, set to be released this week.

The report will outline strategies to contain costs. But it will not call on the Legislature to invest more money in the struggling agency, an administration official familiar with its contents said.

The report notes that some key sources of revenue are capped by law. The agency can raise fares by only 5 percent every two years, for instance.

But the panel calls on the T to do more with its existing resources, such as cracking down on passengers who evade fares and squeezing more money from its parking lots and real estate holdings.

“There are fundamental management practices and operational practices that really need to be put in place first and foremost,” said Jane Garvey, a panelist and former administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration. “We certainly acknowledge that chronic underinvestment has been an issue, but we need to right the ship first.”

Shocking, the recommendation is to cut costs and don’t try to increase revenue. I’m sure that’s going to help with those 40 year old cars.

Snow and Holiday

So the Boston area got a few inches of snow today which means:

Just after 7 Sunday evening, with another 2.9 inches of fresh snow blanketing Boston, the National Weather Service in Taunton announced that the city notched its snowiest winter since records started being kept in 1872.

The official total at Logan International Airport reached 108.6 inches — one inch more than the previous record, which was set in the 1995-1996 winter, according to the weather service.

It could be that will be all we get, but there are still a few weeks for more possible snow.

For some reason this reminds me of Green Day:

Ok, not really but I was thinking back to the time this came out. The days of ‘Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists’, being called traitor if you didn’t like all the parts of the Patriot Act, being asked why you loved Saddam Hussein and hated America if you questioned going to war in Iraq. A time when all of America came together, until Republicans decided it made for a good campaign issue. This song was one of the first loud attacks against these attitudes and it made me very happy.

Previous Older Entries


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 215 other followers

%d bloggers like this: