DISCLOSE filibustered again

So, the DISCLOSE act has again been filibustered. Scott Brown and John McCain have similar reasons for their opposition:

Republican Scott Brown, called the legislation “a cynical ploy masquerading as reform” in restating his opposition. Brown voted against a previous version put to a vote in 2010.

“Rather than treat all sides equally as a true reform bill would, it contains special carve-outs for union bosses and other favored interest groups,” he said.

As Rick Hasen notes, I assume this means they will draft a bill that they support and make it clear exactly what they want changed. After all, the bill does apply to everyone:

A bill being debated this week in the Senate, called the Disclose Act of 2012, is a well-researched, well-conceived solution to this insufferable situation. Unfortunately, on Monday, the Senate voted, mostly along party lines, to block the bill from going forward. But the Disclose Act is not dead. As of now, it is 9 short of the 60 votes it needs.

The bill was introduced by Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, who deserves tremendous credit for crafting such comprehensive legislation, listening to his critics and amending his bill to address their concerns in a bold display of compromise. At its core, Whitehouse’s bill would require any “covered organization” which spends $10,000 or more on a “campaign-related disbursement” to file a disclosure report with the Federal Election Commission within 24 hours of the expenditure, and to file a new report for each additional $10,000 or more that is spent. The F.E.C. must post the report on its Web site within 24 hours of receiving it.

A “covered organization” includes any corporation, labor organization, section 501(c) organization, super PAC or section 527 organization.

Charles Pierce finds Freedom Works engaging in a bit of comedy:

When changing the rules of political participation, Congress should err on the side of encouraging participation, not discouraging it with ambiguous legalese that only empowers lawyers.

Ha ha, that’s really funny:

In 2011 and 2012, 11 states have passed new voter ID laws. Not coincidentally,  the impetus has come from Republicans. In an embarrassing display of candor, the  Republican leader of Pennsylvania’s House, in rattling off a series of  legislative accomplishments, said, “Voter ID, which is gonna allow Gov. Romney  to win the state of Pennsylvania — done!” Republican-controlled legislatures  also have enacted restrictions on early voting, including voting on Sundays (a  day African American churches often sponsor “Souls to the Polls” programs), and  ended same-day registration.

Of course, rich people are more equal than the rest of us.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: