Posted on May 26, 2009 by fredtopeka
People who defend torture always seem to come around to the ticking time bomb question (in fact, the Bush administration thought a nuke had been smuggled into NY City). The idea that we should shape our policy around a on in a billion happenstance doesn’t seem to bother them (if a person saved New York [...]
Filed under: security, torture | Tagged: Afghanistan, Iraq, terrorists, torture | Leave a Comment »
Posted on May 15, 2009 by fredtopeka
Back in February, the Obama administration had argued that a case against Boeing should be dropped because it might reveal state secrets. They lost that argument with an appropriate judicial rebuke:
The court said the government could ask judges to conduct a case-by-case review of whether the disclosure of specific documents would jeopardize national security. But [...]
Filed under: security, torture | Tagged: national security, obama, State Secrets, torture | 1 Comment »
Posted on May 14, 2009 by fredtopeka
President Obama is now against the release of photos that show the abuse of prisoners:
President Obama declared yesterday that he would try to block the court-ordered release of photos showing US troops abusing prisoners, abruptly reversing his position out of concern the pictures would “further inflame anti-American opinion” and endanger American forces in Iraq and [...]
Filed under: Iraq, torture | Tagged: Iraq, obama, politics, torture | Leave a Comment »
Posted on April 28, 2009 by fredtopeka
Via Tom Tomorrow, Mark Danner has two long reports on torture based on the Red Cross’ report. Together they make it obvious that there was torture (and show how simple things become torture: standing, sitting, being in a box, …) and how the Bush administration used the debate on torture to to turn the discussion [...]
Filed under: Afghanistan, Iraq, torture | Tagged: Bush, cheney, terrorists, torture | Leave a Comment »
Posted on April 23, 2009 by fredtopeka
As more information comes out, it becomes more and more difficult to know why the Bush administration turned to torture. This op-ed by an FBI interrogator notes that they got information without using torture:
It is inaccurate, however, to say that Abu Zubaydah had been uncooperative. Along with another F.B.I. agent, and with several C.I.A. officers [...]
Filed under: Afghanistan, Iraq, torture | Tagged: Bush, Iraq, terrorists, torture | 2 Comments »
Posted on April 20, 2009 by fredtopeka
I have always thought that someone should go to jail for the torture by US agents, but I used to think it should only be the people who set it up. Now, I’m not so sure:
The C.I.A. officers used waterboarding at least 83 times in August 2002 against Abu Zubaydah, according to a 2005 Justice [...]
Filed under: craziness, torture | Tagged: Bush, craziness, obama, torture | Leave a Comment »
Posted on April 17, 2009 by fredtopeka
The memos written by the the Bush administration’s Office of Legal Council have been released by President Obama. This is a good thing, but Obama is still holding to this:
This is a time for reflection, not retribution. I respect the strong views and emotions that these issues evoke. We have been through a dark and [...]
Filed under: security, torture | Tagged: Bush, Justice Department, obama, State Secrets, torture | Leave a Comment »
Posted on March 23, 2009 by fredtopeka
This (via Kevin Drum) would be a good thing:
Over objections from the U.S. intelligence community, the White House is moving to declassify—and publicly release—three internal memos that will lay out, for the first time, details of the “enhanced” interrogation techniques approved by the Bush administration for use against “high value” Qaeda detainees. The memos, written by [...]
Filed under: torture | Tagged: Bush, obama, State Secrets, torture | Leave a Comment »
Posted on March 20, 2009 by fredtopeka
I would have liked this article by Lawrence Wilkerson, chief of staff to Colin Powell, a lot better if it had come out when this was all happening. Many of the things he mentions are now widely known, but this really shows what can happen when you don’t follow the rules:
The fourth unknown is the [...]
Filed under: Afghanistan, justice, torture | Tagged: Afghanistan, Guantanamo, justice, terrorists, torture | 1 Comment »
Posted on March 2, 2009 by fredtopeka
The Justice Department has now released some of the memos written after 9/11 by the Bush administration. Some of it is simply stunning:
The legal memos written by the Bush administration’s Office of Legal Counsel show a government grappling with how to wage war on terrorism in a fast-changing world. The conclusion, reiterated in page after [...]
Filed under: craziness, security, torture | Tagged: Bush, craziness, national security, obama, State Secrets, torture | 1 Comment »
Posted on February 10, 2009 by fredtopeka
I talked about the Binyam Mohamed yesterday. Since then, the NY Times has put out an article with this important bit (bold added):
“Is there anything material that has happened” that might have caused the Justice Department to shift its views, asked Judge Mary M. Schroeder, an appointee of President Jimmy Carter, coyly referring to the recent [...]
Filed under: security, torture | Tagged: national security, obama, State Secrets, torture | 1 Comment »
Posted on February 9, 2009 by fredtopeka
Last Thursday, I said that I was a little worried because the Obama administration had continued a Bush administration policy of using a ’state secrets’ argument to dismiss cases. Then I said that we would see more with their arguments in the Binyam Mohamed case. That happened today and now I’m definitely worried:
A year ago the [...]
Filed under: security, torture | Tagged: national security, obama, torture | Leave a Comment »
Posted on February 5, 2009 by fredtopeka
This makes me a little worried that President Obama might not be for open government as much as he said:
Two British High Court judges ruled against releasing documents describing the treatment of a British detainee at the Guantanamo Bay prison, but made clear their reluctance, saying that the United States had threatened to withhold intelligence cooperation [...]
Filed under: security, torture | Tagged: national security, obama, torture | 1 Comment »
Posted on January 14, 2009 by fredtopeka
I know this isn’t a surprise to anyone who’s followed the news at all, but Susan Crawford gave that the reason for not trying to prosecute a prisoner:
“We tortured [Mohammed al-]Qahtani,” said Susan J. Crawford, in her first interview since being named convening authority of military commissions by Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates in February [...]
Filed under: justice, torture | Tagged: Bush, Guantanamo, torture | Leave a Comment »
Posted on July 2, 2008 by fredtopeka
it turns out that:
The military trainers who came to Guantánamo Bay in December 2002 based an entire interrogation class on a chart showing the effects of “coercive management techniques” for possible use on prisoners, including “sleep deprivation,” “prolonged constraint,” and “exposure.”
What the trainers did not say, and may not have known, was that their chart [...]
Filed under: craziness, torture | Tagged: craziness, Guantanamo, torture | 2 Comments »
Posted on June 25, 2008 by fredtopeka
It’s always interesting to follow links and ideas to see where they lead. I started here where Philip Gourevitch talks about his book about torture and Abu Ghraib, noticing that Mark Twain had noticed 100 years ago that photographs could make the difference when talking about atrocities.
Thus linking Iraq and the Congo under King Leopold II [...]
Filed under: Iraq, World, torture | Tagged: Abu Ghraib, Congo, Guantanamo, Iraq, torture | Leave a Comment »
Posted on June 18, 2008 by fredtopeka
The fourth day of McClatchy’s series on Guantanamo and other detention facilities looks at how the framework was decided:
It was largely the work of five White House, Pentagon and Justice Department lawyers who, following the orders of President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney, reinterpreted or tossed out the U.S. and international laws that govern [...]
Filed under: Afghanistan, justice, torture | Tagged: Afghanistan, Guantanamo, terrorists, torture | Leave a Comment »
Posted on June 17, 2008 by fredtopeka
Via here, McClatchy’s has a week long series on the capture, detention, and running of camps for Afghanistan prisoners.
The first shows why Habeas Corpus is such an important legal concept:
In 2002, a CIA analyst interviewed several dozen detainees at Guantanamo and reported to senior National Security Council officials that many of them didn’t belong there, a [...]
Filed under: Afghanistan, justice, torture | Tagged: Afghanistan, Guantanamo, justice, terrorists, torture | Leave a Comment »
Posted on May 23, 2008 by fredtopeka
In an address to BC law graduates, Attorney General Mukasey basically said that no one should be punished for torture:
One memo defined torture, as recognized by U.S. law, as covering “only extreme acts” causing pain similar in intensity to that caused by organ failure or accompanying death.
An internal Justice Department investigation is now considering whether [...]
Filed under: AG, craziness, torture | Tagged: craziness, Mukasey, torture | Leave a Comment »
Posted on April 28, 2008 by fredtopeka
Via TPM, not this bit from the NY Times article:
“The fact that an act is undertaken to prevent a threatened terrorist attack, rather than for the purpose of humiliation or abuse, would be relevant to a reasonable observer in measuring the outrageousness of the act,” said Brian A. Benczkowski, a deputy assistant attorney general, in [...]
Filed under: torture | Tagged: Bush, torture | Leave a Comment »